3,000 Km on Schwalbe One Tubeless

With much fanfare, last year Schwalbe launched their ONE tyre, which comes as tubular, clincher and more interestingly tubeless. I say more interestingly because the current road tubeless market is minute and lacks competition between manufacturers, as well as choice for the public. Since then, I haven’t heard much, partly because not many dare running road tubeless tyres yet and partly due to cronic lack of stock. I therefore enquired whether I could have a pair of these babes in 25 mm format to test ride and review and Dave at Schwalbe UK promptly sent me a pair, together with their own branded sealant, which is made by Stans.

As I unpacked the tyres, it became immediately evident these are no lightweights and in fact they come at 350 grams a piece… Why are tubelss tyres so much heavier than clinchers? Essentially because they are air tight, hence made of rubber with low porosity, which weighs more. They are also reinforced and have a more robust carcass compared to your average race tyre. Does it matter? Well, that’s what this review is hopefully going to find out.

The fit: I washed tyres and my HED Belgium plus rims with soapy water to help with the fit and improve air tightness and they went on without fuss, much like an average clincher, in fact less fuss, as I didn’t even need to be careful not to pinch the inner tube. I pumped them up to 80 PSI, they popped nicely all along the bead. On my rims, they come at a fat 28 mm. They are air tight with no need of sealant, but I injected 20 ml of sealant via the valve and re inflated them to make them puncture proof… Ready to go!

The ride: over a full week I rode the tyres every single day for a total of about 300 Km, including 4 commutes into work and two hilly rides, one in the Chiltern hills with Colin and one on my own around Box Hill. So, how do they ride? The answer is they ride great! I didn’t honestly expect a 350 grams clincher to have the same ride quality of my Corsa CX tubulars, but with better cornering. The range of recommended pressure is between 70 and 110 PSI and I stayed on the low side at 80. Over the week they never really lost pressure and from the initial 80 PSI, there were still well over 70 today. They feel very lively, with the characteristic hollow sound of light race tyres. Acceleration is excellent and once at speed they like to stay there. Schwalbe makes a big fuss about the low rolling resistance and there is some truth in it as on smooth tarmac (not that there is much round here) they are very fast indeed. How do they climb? I managed to keep Colin’s pace up the climb to the old Ski resort in Wycombe and Winter hill in Marlow, so that’s good news, as he is always in good form. Because I put on a couple of Kg over summer, I dropped the water bottle at the bottom of Box hill and managed to match my best climbing time (or I should say beat by 1 full second?) achieved on a marginally lighter bike and a lighter body. I don’t think it is by chance: the perfectly smooth road surface, combined with gentle gradient of Box hill are an ideal terrain to test whether rolling resistance matters even uphill. I didn’t get the chance to ride them in the wet, but I am not very aggressive when it rains and unlikely to take full advantage of any improvement in grip. They did seem excellent in the dry. In terms of comfort, I was hardly going to be impressed, as I spent the previous week riding a set of spongy cyclocross tyres. They seem OK and I’d have no problem in recommending them to any long distance rider, although in terms of suppleness I’d say a pair of Vittoria Pave’ fitted with latex inner tubes is still the benchmark.

Wear: 300 Km is not a lot and I wasn’t certainly expecting to square off the rear tyre or anything, but I have had tyres which showed cuts and bruises after a similar mileage. I have gone through the front and rear and didn’t spot any cut, so it is possible they might be reasonably long lasting. Remember this is a high performance tyre, which should be compared to the high end Vittoria and Continental range, rather than to a high mileage touring tyre. Most if not all punctures will be sealed by the latex emulsion, so some extra mileage can be squeezed before the tyre becomes useless.

EDIT: 3,000 Km after the first fit, I have become really fond of these tyres. We’ve done the Gent-Wevelgem, spring rides in the Alps and training rides in the Chilterns and in the Surrey hills. They have been nothing short of outstanding. The speed is phenomenal and the grip is what you would expect from a top end tyre. At 70-80 PSI the comfort is adequate for long days on the saddle too. The rubber cuts relatively easily and punctures are more frequent than on some hard rubber tyres, but every single one of the 5 punctures I suffered sealed with Stans No Tubes liquid and I never had to do anything, other than topping up the liquid when I lost a lot of it. A couple of punctures took a while to seal whilst riding, but the pressure never went down below 60 PSI, which is still a very reasonable riding pressure for these.
They are now coming towards the end of their usable life, someone might want to push them a bit further, but I prefer to retire them. They are top end racing tyres and they are not designed to offer top end performance forever.

So is this THE ONE tyre that will convince you to try tubeless? I think so, the combination of a faff free installation and the fact that it doesn’t come short of speed over a top end clincher tyre on the flat and on an incline, makes it ideal to overcome the fear of trying new technology. It is a fantastic tyre, it is not a tyre that comes cheap, but if you care more about performance than how things look, then money spent on tyres is invested in fun, rather than wasted on fancy stems, integrated handlebars and carbon seatposts.

Eight common myths about tubeless:

1) If the sealant doesn’t work you are stranded: sealant works for most punctures, not all punctures. In case of a very large tear, you should carry an inner tube and fit it in exactly the same way you would with a clincher

2) Tubeless is messy: a latex emulsion might spill when you inject it, it’s not as bad as having to clean baby’s sick or having to pick a dog’s turd… it doesn’t smell and it’s not toxic… it’s just rubber, water and a mild alkali and looks like milk past its use by date. If you can live with a dog, you can live with tubeless, get over it.

3) Tubeless tyres can burst off the rim: Do you ever think about that when you drive? Your car tyres are tubeless, it’s been like that for 60 years.

4) Tubeless road tyres are pointless: read above.

5) Tubeless is not a mature technology: read above.

6) I read horror stories about tubeless tyres gone bad on the web: I am sure on the web you can find horror stories about baking or decorating gone bad. I tend to believe in horror stories which involve weapons and things gone bad.

7) If I puncture, latex will spray all over: true in the case of large punctures, as above, it’s only water, latex and a mild alkali… most of it ends on your seat tube. if it was baby’s sick I wouldn’t use it, honest!

8) Tubeless tyres are impossible to fit: on a tight rim they can be hard to fit… in my experience they are not particularly hard to fit.

4 thoughts on “3,000 Km on Schwalbe One Tubeless

  1. Pingback: Fleet Moss and a pair of IRC Roadlite tubeless tyres | whosatthewheel

  2. Over six years gone by…but in your recent hillclimb story you say you were using conventional clinchers? Did you persist with tubeless for Audax? I had good service from the Schwalbe Pro Ones, but found fitting them to the Kinlin rims hellish. Hutchinson tubeless fit really easily on to Shimano rims and are reliable and comfortable, so I mostly use them now. By contrast, I was disappointed with the costly IRC tyres supplied (and fitted) by Cycle Clinic, which though very grippy lose pressure quickly.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Hi Martin, good to hear from you. I’ve given up on tubeless about 3 years ago. I was hopeful it would become easier to live with, cheaper, better, but it’s pretty much the same technology as it was back in 2014. You still need the sealant, the tyres are still difficult to fit, no real improvement, the price is still very high and availability still very patchy. So I gave up…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s